<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Insider Magazine - Los Angeles South Bay &#187; banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/tag/banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider</link>
	<description>Business Insider Magazine is Your Business Publication for the Los Angeles South Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Economists Opposing Federal Reserve Audit Have Undisclosed Fed Ties</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/economists-opposing-fed-audit-have-undisclosed-fed-ties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/economists-opposing-fed-audit-have-undisclosed-fed-ties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor and Publisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR 1207]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Blog Editor&#8217;s Note:</strong> This piece delivers more exposure than the usual establishment press critique of the current controversy surrounding the Federal Reserve. However, the focus on key economists with Fed connections ignores the fact the identity of the private investors with controlling interests in the Federal Reserve is what they REALLY don&#8217;t want you to know. That&#8217;s why Fed supporters are open to a little more transparency they can control, but will put their full global financial weight in front of any attempt to conduct a full audit of the organization.</em></p>
<p>(This Huffington Post) As the debate over an audit of ... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/economists-opposing-fed-audit-have-undisclosed-fed-ties/">Continue Reading</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/economists-opposing-fed-audit-have-undisclosed-fed-ties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuing deflation in real economy</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/continuing-deflation-in-real-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/continuing-deflation-in-real-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor and Publisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Reckoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Deficit21.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-596" title="Deficit2[1]" src="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Deficit21.jpg" alt="Deficit2[1]" width="150" height="150" /></a>By Bill Bonner</strong></p>
<p>(The Daily Reckoning)</p>
<p>Financiers have the world’s financial system in a “doom loop,” says the Bank of England. We’ve thought so ourselves. The bankers take money from the government and use it to speculate, not to lend. “Excess” reserves are at a record high as consumer credit continues to decline.</p>
<p>Most people find it both galling and absurd to see the bankers getting $10 million bonuses while there is 10% unemployment. Here at <em>The Daily Reckoning</em>, it’s just a matter of curiosity. You’d think there would be more wage competition ... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/continuing-deflation-in-real-economy/">Continue Reading</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/continuing-deflation-in-real-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US banks prepaying $45 billion in insurance fees</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/us-banks-prepaying-45-billion-in-insurance-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/us-banks-prepaying-45-billion-in-insurance-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor and Publisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Los Angeles Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(The Los Angeles Times) WASHINGTON &#8212; U.S. banks will prepay about $45 billion in premiums to replenish a federal deposit insurance fund now in the red, under a plan adopted by federal regulators.</p>
<p>The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. board voted Thursday to mandate the early payments of premiums for 2010 through 2012. Amid the struggling economy and rising loan defaults, 120 banks have failed so far this year costing the insurance fund more than $28 billion.</p>
<p>To address concerns of small banks in weak financial condition, the FDIC also set up an exemption process for those that prove the prepaid fees would ... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/us-banks-prepaying-45-billion-in-insurance-fees/">Continue Reading</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/11/us-banks-prepaying-45-billion-in-insurance-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facing A Total Breakdown Of Financial Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/facing-a-total-breakdown-of-financial-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/facing-a-total-breakdown-of-financial-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor and Publisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Bob Chapman</strong></p>
<p><a title='Original Link: http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com'  href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?6xZW0NW5">The International Forecaster</a></p>
<p>Yet another bank bights the dust, stocks have net outflows of capital, big insider sell offs and other bad moves that enable insiders to control the market, biggest S&#38;P rally ever, Plunge protection team working overtime, Gold in a new phase</p>
<p>This is another victim of the FDIC Friday Night Financial Follies.</p>
<p>Early Friday morning, state and federal agents walked into the Bank of Elmwood and closed the failed 49-year-old independent bank after a year of struggling to improve a bleak financial situation, officials announced Friday.</p>
<p>The Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions shut down ... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/facing-a-total-breakdown-of-financial-markets/">Continue Reading</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/facing-a-total-breakdown-of-financial-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernanke&#8217;s trillion-dollar decision</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/bernankes-trillion-dollar-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/bernankes-trillion-dollar-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor and Publisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/091023_bernake_1_ap_29711.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-265" title="091023_bernake_1_ap_297[1]" src="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/091023_bernake_1_ap_29711-150x150.jpg" alt="091023_bernake_1_ap_297[1]" width="150" height="150" /></a>(Politico) The biggest decision of the <a title='Original Link: http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/EconomicRecovery'  href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?qP7oFOYx" target="_blank">economic recovery</a> will be made in the next six months, and <a title='Original Link: http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/BarackObama'  href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?0MIHLUDO" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a> will have almost nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>Forget the debate over <a title='Original Link: http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/TARP'  href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?sjs_bxeK" target="_blank">TARP</a>, and never mind the questions about a second stimulus. This decision is about when to pull out $1 trillion that’s propping up the U.S. banking system. And it will be <a title='Original Link: http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/FederalReserve'  href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/?9yfiStL8" target="_blank">Federal Reserve</a> Chairman <a title='Original ... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/bernankes-trillion-dollar-decision/">Continue Reading</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.us/BusinessInsider/2009/10/bernankes-trillion-dollar-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

